ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August
10,
1989
KATHY WESTERN AND
)
JEFFREY WESTERN,
Complainants
v.
)
PCB 89-44
MOLINE CORPORATION,
Respondent
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,
Complainant,
v
)
PCB 89—87
MOLINE CORPORATION,
Respondent.
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by J. Marlin):
This matter comes before upon a Motion to Impose Costs and
to Bar Testimony of Kathy Western and Jeffrey Western filed on
July 19,
1989 by respondent Moline Corporation (Moline).
The
Western’s response was filed on August
4,
1989.
Moline moves
the Board
to impose sanctions upon the Westerns
for their alleged willful failure
to appear
for depositions
in
accordance with subpoenas issues by the Hearing Officer.
On
July
7,
1989,
the Hearing Officer issued a subpoena against Kathy
Western ordering her
to appear
at the Chicago Office of Moline’s
legal counsel on July 13,
1989 and a subpoena against Jeffrey
Western ordering him to appear
in Chicago for a deposition on
July
14,
1989.
Pursuant
to the Western’s Motion
to Modify
Subpoenas,
the Hearing Officer entered an order
requiring both
Kathy Western and Jeffrey Western to appear
in Chicago for
depositions on July 14,
1989.
The Western’s request
to change
the location of the depositions
to
St.
Charles was denied.
The
Board notes
that, under
its new Procedural Rules effective July
11,
1989,
a witness subpoenaed for
a deposition may
be
required
to attend only
in the county
in which he or she
resides or
maintains an office address unless otherwise ordered by the Board
(35
Ill.
Adm. Code 101.260(h).)
The Hearing Officer should be
aware of this rule
in considering
the location of any rescheduled
102—45
—2—
depositions.
At approximately 5:00 p.m. on July 13,
1989, Jeffrey Western
telephoned Moline’s counsel to let him know that he and Kathy
would be unable to attend the depositions on July 14,
1989 and
asking that the depositions be rescheduled.
This information was
left with counsel’s receptionist.
At 5:14 p.m. that same day,
Jeffrey Western left a message on counsel’s answering machine
that the Westerns were unable to attend the deposition the next
day.
On the morning of July
14, 1989, Jeffrey Western spoke with
Moline’s Counsel stating that neither he nor Kathy would attend
the deposition and suggesting that a new date be set.
The procedural
rules of the Board provide that “tif
a party
unreasonably refuses to
*
*
*
comply with any order entered by
the Board or the hearing officer,
including any subpoena issued
by the Board or hearing officer,
the Board will order sanctions.”
(35 Ill. Mm.
Code 101.280(a).)
Furthermore,
the Board has the
authority to impose costs upon any noncomplying party.
(Adopted
Rule:
Final Order R88—5(A), June 8, 1989.)
Motions to Impose
Sanctions are properly directed to the Board only.
Initially,
the Board notes that Moline incorrectly
interprets
the language in Section 101.280(a) providing that “the
Board will impose sanctions”
as depriving the Board of its
discretion in
imposing sanctions upon a noncomplying party.
Moline ignores the language
in the rule that sanctions will be
imposed where a party “unreasonably” refuses to comply.
The
Board finds
that the Western’s failure to appear at the scheduled
deposition
is not unreasonable, as they made a reasonable attempt
to notify Moline of their work-related scheduling conflict and
their desire to reschedule.
Therefore,
no sanctions will be
imposed.
Respondents Motion to Impose Costs and to Bar Testimony
is denied.
IT
IS SO ORDERED.
I,
Dorothy
M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereby certify
t
t the above Order was adopted on
the ~
day of
____________________,
1989, by a vote
of
7-o
Dorothy M. Gu~1n,Clerk
Illinois Pol~utionControl Board
102—46