ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    January 23, 1975
    ELMHURST COUNTRY CLUB,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 74—354
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent,
    Mr. Lawrence
    X.
    Pusateri, appeared on behalf of Petitioner;
    Mr. John T. Bernbom, appeared on behalf of Respondent.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Mr. Dumelle):
    Petitioner filed a petition for variance on September
    30,
    1974.
    On October 11,
    1974,
    the Board required petitioner
    to submit an amended petition for variance stating the
    specific rule or regulation from which a variance was requested.
    On October 28, 1974 petitioner amended its variance petition
    specifically requesting a variance from Rule 404(a)
    of the
    Water Pollution Regulations.
    OnNovember 25,
    1974 the
    Environmental Protection Agency (Agency)
    filed its recommendation
    to deny the variance request.
    No hearing was held.
    Petitioner owns and operates the Elmhurst Country Club,
    consisting of an 18—hole golf course with a clubhouse containing
    a lounge and restaurant.
    The Country Club is open seven
    days per week.
    Approximately 12,000 gallons per day of
    sewage are produced at the Country Club.
    Petitioner has an
    existing extended aeration treatment facility.
    The sewage
    treatment plant was designed to treat 15,000 gallons per
    day.
    The effluent from petitioner’s sewage treatment plant
    is discharged to Salt Creek.
    Petitioner must meet the
    effluent standard of 30 mg/i BOD and 37 mg/i of suspended
    solids found in Rule 404(a)
    of the Water Pollution Regulations.
    Petitioner alleges that it is engaged in negotiations
    with the Village of Addison preparatory to diversion of its
    wastewater to the Village of Addison sewage treatment system
    and the subsequent abandonment of petitioner’s sewage treatment
    plant.
    Petitioner is also investigating the possibility of
    modifying its treatment plant in order to comply with Rule
    15 —307

    —2—
    404(a)
    in the event that petitioner does not divert its
    wastewaters to the Village of Addison.
    Petitioner alleges
    that compliance with Rule 404(a) would require an expenditure
    of approximately $100,000, which would be totally lost
    should it elect
    to divert flows to the Village of Addison
    sometime in the future.
    Petitioner further alleges that the
    injury
    to the public would be minimal because of dilution
    present in Salt Creek.
    The
    Agency stated that it conducted an investigation of
    petitioner’s sewage treatment plant on October 24, 1974 and
    found that the facilities were “completely out of service
    and it appeared that they had been out of service for some
    time’. The Agency characterized petitioner’s effluent as
    “murky grey and septic”.
    In addition,
    petitioner has been
    without a treatment plant operator for the past year.
    The Board finds that a petitioner who seeks
    a variance
    should be exhibiting good faith.
    At a minimum, this
    means that the Country Club should operate its sewage
    treatment plant to obtain the best effluent possible.
    It has disregarded its obligations.
    For this reason,
    the
    Board has decided to deny petitioner’s request.
    This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and
    conclusions of law.
    ORDER
    Petitioner’s request for a variance from Rule 404(a)
    of
    the Water Pollution Regulations is hereby denied without
    prejudice.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order were
    adopted on the ~Z~’~°
    day of January,
    1975 by a vote of
    ~/-~
    ()____
    Christari L. Mo~fett,
    k
    Illinois Pollution Co
    01 Board
    15 —308

    Back to top