ILLINOIS
    POLLUTION
    CONTROL
    BOARD
    January 7,
    1993
    VEACH
    OIL
    COMPANY
    &
    LAKE
    OF
    EGYPT
    WATER
    DISTRICT,
    Petitioners,
    v.
    PCB
    92—202
    (variance)
    ILLINOIS
    ENVIRONMENTAL
    PROTECTION
    AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    ORDER
    OF
    TEE
    BOARD
    (by
    G
    T.
    Girard):
    On
    December
    7,
    1992,
    V.ach
    Oil
    filed
    m
    petition
    for
    variance
    froa
    35
    Ill. Ads.
    Code 602.105(a),
    Standards
    for
    Issuance,
    aM frau
    35
    Iii.
    Ads.
    Code
    602.106(a),
    Restricted
    Itatus.
    The
    petition
    asserts
    that
    “the
    purpose
    of
    this
    variance
    request
    is to allow the
    extension
    of
    the
    present
    water
    distribution
    system
    of
    the
    Lake
    of
    Egypt
    Water
    District
    (Districtj
    which
    is
    necessary
    ‘to enable
    it to
    serve
    commercial
    property
    located
    adjac.nt
    to
    th.
    intersection
    of.
    Illinois
    Route
    148
    with
    Interstate
    57
    In
    ~axtrsae
    southern
    Willia~son County,
    Illinois
    which
    property
    .
    is
    aimed
    by
    the
    petitioner”.
    By order of
    December
    17, .1992, the Board ordered
    Veach
    to
    file
    an
    amended’
    petition
    joining the
    District,
    end
    supplying certain additional information.
    On. December 28,
    1992, the
    Agency
    filed
    a motion to dismiss.
    On January 5,
    1993, Veach filed an amended petition.
    The amended
    petition joins the District as a petitioner and
    r.qussts
    bearing on
    th. petition.
    Veach has not
    responded
    to
    the motion to dismiss.
    Pursuant
    to
    the
    Board’
    s
    December
    17
    order,
    the
    Board‘a
    decision
    tiseclock
    restarted
    on
    January
    5,
    1993..
    The
    Agency’s
    December
    28,
    1992
    motion
    to
    dismis.
    is
    denied
    as
    soot, given
    the
    filing
    of
    the
    January
    5
    amended petition.
    However,
    the Agency remains
    free to file
    a
    new motion relating to the
    January 5 petition.
    This
    matter
    is
    accepted
    for
    bearing.
    Hearing
    must
    be
    scheduled within
    14 days
    of
    the
    date
    of
    this
    Order
    and
    coupisted
    within
    60 days
    of
    the
    date of this
    Order.
    The
    hearing officer
    shall inform the Clerk of the Board of
    the time and location of the
    hearing at
    least
    40 days
    in advance of bearing so that
    public
    notice of hearing may be published.
    After hearing,
    the
    hearing
    officer shall submit an exhibit list and all actual exhibits to the
    Board within 5 days of the bearing.
    Any
    briefing schedule
    shall
    provide for final filings as expeditiously as possible and in no
    0138-0321

    2
    event later than 70 days from the date of this order.
    If
    after
    appropriate
    consultation with
    the
    parties,
    the
    parties
    fail
    to
    provide
    an acceptable hearing date or
    if
    after
    an
    attempt the hearing officer
    is
    unable
    to
    consult
    with
    th.
    parties,
    the
    hearing
    officer
    shall
    unilaterally
    set a hearing
    date
    in
    conformance with the schedule
    above.
    This
    schedule
    will
    only
    provide the Board a
    very
    short time
    period
    to
    deliberate and reach
    a decision before the
    due
    date.
    The
    hearing officer and the
    parties are enc~uragedto expedite this proceeding
    as
    ‘much
    as
    possible.
    Within 10 days of accepting this case, the Hearing Officer
    shall enter a Hearing Officer Scheduling Order
    gOverning
    coapletion
    of the record.
    That Order shall
    set a date
    certain
    for
    each aspect
    of
    the
    case
    including:
    briefing
    schedule,
    bearing
    date(s),
    completion of discovery (if necessary) and pre—hearing conference
    (if
    .
    necessary).
    The
    Hearing Officer Scheduling Order may
    be
    modified
    by entry of a complete new scheduling
    order
    confOrming
    with
    the
    time
    requirements
    below.
    The hearing officer may
    extend
    this’
    schedul. only
    on
    a waiver
    of
    the
    decision
    deadline
    by
    the
    petitioner and
    only for
    the
    equivalent or fewer number of days that the decision deadline is
    waived.
    Such waivers must be provided
    in
    writing
    to
    the
    Clerk
    of
    the Board.
    Any
    waiver must be an •open
    .váiivsr”
    or a waiver of
    decision
    until
    a
    date
    certain.
    Any waiver
    shall
    extend the time
    deadline
    of
    Section
    104.180
    regarding
    filing
    the
    Agency
    recommendation
    by
    the
    equivalent
    number of days,
    but
    in’
    any
    circumstance
    the
    recommendation
    must
    be
    tiled
    at
    least
    20
    days
    before
    the
    hearing.
    Because
    of requirements
    regarding
    the publication
    of notice
    of
    bearing,
    no
    scheduled
    hearing
    may
    be
    cancelled
    unles.
    the
    petitioner provides an open waiver or a waiver to a date at least
    120 days beyond the date of the motion to cancel hearing.
    This
    should allow
    ample
    time
    for
    the
    Board
    to re~ubli.hnotice
    of
    bearing
    and receive transcripts
    from, the bearing before the
    due.
    date.
    .
    Any order by the hearing officer granting cancellation of
    bearing shall include a complete new
    scheduling order with a new
    bearing date at least
    40 days in the
    future
    and
    at least 30 days
    prior to the new due date
    and
    the
    Clerk of the Board shall be
    promptly informed of the new
    schedule.
    Because this proceeding is the type for which ..t.~~ Illinois
    Environmental Protection Act sets a very short
    statütor,
    deadline
    for making
    a decision,
    absent a waiver,
    the Board will grant
    extensions
    or modifications only
    in unusual circumstances.
    Any
    such
    motion must
    set forth
    an alternative schedule for notice,
    hearing,
    and
    final
    submissions,
    as
    well
    as
    the
    deadline
    for
    decision, including response time to such a motion.
    However, no
    such motion shall negate the obligation of the hearing officer to
    0138-0322

    3
    establish
    a
    Scheduling
    Order
    pursuant
    to
    the
    requirements
    of
    this
    order, anc~to adhere to that order until modified.
    IT IS SO ORDERED
    I, Dorothy H.
    Gunn,
    Clerk of the Illinois Pollution control
    ~
    hereby certify
    at the above
    order
    was
    adopted
    on
    the
    T’~4—~
    day of _______________________, 1993, by a vote of
    ‘L~j
    orothy Pt. Ø~n,
    Clerk
    Illinois Pc~~Zution
    Control Board
    0138-0323

    Back to top