ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
December 13,
1973
CONCERNED CITIZENS COMMITTEE,
Complainant,
v.
)
PC~3
73—92
CITY OF GENOA,
Respondent.
Stanley Olsen appeared for Concerned Citizens Committee
Robert C.
Jenkins, City Attorney on behalf of City of Genoa
OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by Mr. Henss)
Chairman Roy Tewksbury
(now deceased) and co-chairman
Stanley Olsen, representing the Cbncerned Citizens Committee,
filed a formal Complaint with the Board on March
6,
1973
charging the City of Genoa with responsibility for sewage
backups in the basements of about
65 houses in Genoa.
The
Genoa attorney stated that the Complainants had failed to serve
a copy of the Complaint on the City, but apparently the parties
did get together and agree upon
a settlement prior to the hearing
date.
On August 7,
1973
a public hearing was conducted.
Neither
party offered evidence but they submitted
a six paragraph Statement
and Settlement Agreement.
The Settlement Agreement ackno~.i1edged
the existence of problems with the sanitary sewer system which had
led certain homeowners
to experience sewage reversals and untreated
sewage in their basements.
This was caused by infiltration into
the sewer lines, direct entry of storm water, illegal connection
by users, defects in the sewer lines by reason of age, improper
installation and poor soil conditions.
It was agreed that the City
‘1shall immediately upon the execution of this Agreernent~inspect
all sewers in the affected area for the purpose of repairing, re-
placing or otherwise correcting such defects; continue application
for and use of available sources of revenue for the purpose of
providing an adequate sewer system;
and commence an exhaustive
survey of the affected area no later than August 20,
1973,
complete
the survey by January
1,
1974 and thereafter complete a survey as
to the entire City.
10—305
—2—
We recently held in Donaldson vs. Elmhurst, PCB 72-389,
that we will hear complaints regarding sewage systems which
deposit sewage in homes.
In this particular case,
however,
the parties have not submitted sufficient information so that
we can come to any conclusions about the inadequacies of the
sewage system.
~hey seem to have worked out their problems
in a manner which
is satisfactory to them and the settlement
does not really call for any action by the Board.
The
only question which is asked of us is whether a sewer
connection ban would be proper.
Our response is that we were
not given sufficient information to reach
a conclusion on the
matter.
The Statute requires that the public be given
30 days
notice of any hearing which might affect the right of the public
to the use of a community sewer.
The hearing must include
a full
inquiry into the social and economic impact of any decision to
restrict usage of the sewer.
(Environmental Protection Act ~
33)
We
have,
on occasion, prohibited further connection
to a sewage
system pending the upgrading of the system, but this is a serious
step to be taken only upon presentation of substantial evidence
regarding the inadequacies of the sewage system and the failure
of the sewer system operator to attend to
those inadequacies.
The Board commends the parties
for the amicable settlement
which has been reached.
We have no reason to disapprove of the
settlement and therefore accept it and terminate the proceedings
herein.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I,
Ctiristan L. Moffett, Clerk of
the
Illinois Pollution Control
Board,
hereby certify the above Opinion and Order was adopted
this
~
day of
__________
1973 by a vote of
$
to p
10— 306