ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    November
    1, 1973
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    )
    )
    vs.
    )
    PCB 73—85
    ALLIS-CHALMERS CORPORATION,
    a
    Delaware corporation, qualified
    )
    to do business in Illinois, and RYDER
    )
    TRUCK RENTAL,
    INC.,
    a Florida
    )
    corporation qualified to do business in)
    Illinois
    )
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Dr. Odell):
    Respondent Allis-Chalmers Corporation, owns and operates
    a diesel oil fuel depot in the Village of Carol Stream,
    Du Page
    County,
    Illinois.
    Respondent Ryder Truck
    Rental,
    Inc. owns
    certain trailer trucks leased to Allis—Chalmers and services
    such trucks at Respondent’s fuel depot.
    Complaint was filed by
    the Environmental Protection Agency on March 2,
    1973, against
    the Respondents alleging that:
    1.
    Allis-Chalmers on August 25, August 26, September
    7,
    1972,
    and on other dates operated and controlled its fuel depot
    in such a manner as to violate Sections 12(a) and 12(d)
    of the
    Environmental Protection Act (hereinafter called Act) and operated
    and controlled said depot in such a manner as to violate Rules
    203(a),
    402, and 403 of Chapter Three:
    Water Pollution Regulations
    of the Illinois Pollution Control Board
    (hereinafter called Chapter
    Three).
    Contaminants were deposited into a drain at the diesel
    oil fuel depot.
    The contaminants ran from the drain pipe into an
    unnamed tributary of Klein Creek and finally flowed into Klein
    Creek in violation of the Act and Chapter Three.
    2.
    Ryder Truck Rental,
    Inc.,
    on August
    28 and September
    7,
    1972,
    and on various other dates used the fuel depot in such
    a manner as to violate Sections 12(a) and 12(d)
    of the Act and
    used the depot in such a manner as to violate Rules 203(a),
    402,
    and 403 of Chapter Three:
    Water Pollution Regulations of the
    Illinois Pollution Control Board.
    Ryder Truck Rental,
    Inc.
    participated in the discharge of contaminants into the drainage
    9
    697

    —2—
    facility on the Allis—Chalmers property.
    These contaminants
    flowed into
    an unnamed tributary of Kelin Creek and finally into
    Klein Creek
    in violation of the Act and Chapter Three.
    A
    hearing was held on July
    9,
    1973.
    The Respondent Allis-
    Chalmers was represented by counsel Ronald
    R.
    Huntley, and the
    Respondent Ryder Truck Rental,
    Inc. was represented by Counsel
    John
    R. Whitman.
    At this hearing the following Stipulation of
    Facts was entered.
    Allis-Chalmers Corporation maintains a parts
    distribution facility at Carol Stream,
    Illinois,
    the premises
    mentioned in the Complaint.
    From this location, trucks are dis-
    patched and deliver parts to various destination points.
    These
    trucks were leased to Allis-Chalmers by Ryder Truck Rentals, mo.
    pursuant to
    a Truck Lease and Service Agreement.
    Under this
    agreement Ryder maintains and fuels these trucks on the Allis-
    Chalmers property at Carol Stream,
    Illinois.
    On Friday, August
    25,
    1972,
    heavy rains occurred at Carol Stream and surrounding
    areas, resulting in emergency flood conditions.
    Such flood
    conditions existed at the Allis-Chalmers facility until Sunday
    night, August 27.
    Because of the torrential rains, water had
    got into the underground fuel storage tanks existing on the Allis-
    Chalmers facility.
    The presence of this water in the underground
    fuel tanks was unknown to Allis—Chalmers on Sunday evening, August
    27,
    1972.
    During the day of August 27,
    Ryder began to receive
    reports that dispatched trucks were malfunctioning on the road and
    the origin of
    the difficulty appeared to be the presence of water
    in the gas tanks.
    At 1:00 a.m. Monday, August 28,
    an employee of
    Ryder Truck Rentals entered the Allis-Chalmers premises and dis-
    covered that recently fueled trucks, soon to be dispatched, had
    significant amounts of water in their gas tanks.
    To prevent
    damage to four trucks, the Ryder employee completely emptied the
    fuel and water admixture into
    a drainage basin in
    the center of
    the truck parking area.
    The employee took such action at his own
    initiative, without consulting with either Ryder or Allis-Chalmers.
    A total of 400 gallons of diesel oil was drained into the catch-
    basin.
    The drained
    fuel went into the unnamed tributary of the
    Klein Creek and finally was discovered
    in the Klein Creek on
    September 7,
    1972.
    Allis—Chalmers learned of the discharge on
    Monday afternoon, August 28.
    Despite immediate unilateral efforts
    to absorb the “scum” by Allis—Chalmers,
    the oil was infact present
    in Klein Creek on September
    7,
    1972.
    On that date,
    an investigator
    of
    the Environmental Protection Agency visited the Allis-Chalmers
    facility and received the full cooperation of Allis-Chalmers.
    It
    is
    not claimed by the EPA that any animal, vegetable,
    or underwater
    life was damaged by Ryder or Allis-Chalmers.
    Allis-Chalmers had
    never before experienced a diesel oil spill or discharge on the
    premises.
    Allis—Chalmers offered $1000 as an appropriate penalty.
    Ryder
    Truck, Inc. offered $2500.
    The Agency recommended that the Board
    accept the penalty offers made, but the Stipulation of Facts and
    Agreement was not made contingent upon the acceptance by the Board
    of these offers.
    9
    698

    —3—
    We find both Respondents guilty of violating Sections 12(a)
    and 12(d)
    of the Act.
    We find further that both Respondents
    violated Rules 203(a)
    ,
    402,
    and 403 of Chapter Three.
    In assess-
    ing a reasonable penalty we are guided by various factors
    enunciated in past Board opinions.
    First,
    a past history of good
    faith compliance in operating
    a facility may operate to mitigate
    the penalty.
    See EPA vs. City of Marion,
    #71—25, #71-225;
    2 PCB
    701,
    706
    (October 28, 1971).
    Second, when the impact of the
    violation is nil or minimal, the penalty need not be as severe.
    See Freeman vs. EPA #71—78;
    2 PCB 709,
    711
    (October 28, 1971).
    Third,
    the deliberateness of the violation is an important factor
    in assessing the penalty.
    See EPA vs. CPC International,
    Inc.,
    #71—338;
    5 PCB 541,
    545
    (October
    3,
    1972).
    In
    a particular case, mitigating factors may be more than
    offset by aggravating factors which tip the scales towards a
    more severe penalty, rather than a less severe one.
    Furthermore,
    ailfactors do not carry the same weight,
    so that the Board’s
    imposition of a penalty is not determined by simply adding up the
    numbe~rof factors on each side.
    Rather,
    the facts and circumstances
    of eath particular case determine the balance
    to be struck.
    The Board concludes that a penalty is proper in this case
    but that it should not be
    severe.
    Neither temporary nor lasting
    harm has been done
    to the environment.
    The difficulty was caused
    by an unexpected flood in a situation which the employee believed
    that he had the responsibility to act quickly.
    The Stipulation
    of Facts
    indicates that Allis-Chalmers has no history of violations.
    There was nothing in the facts concerning this point as to Ryder.
    The penalty to Ryder, however, should be more severe because
    it is
    directly accountable for the actions of its employees.
    Neither
    Respondent is guilty of deliberate violation of the Act, and the
    degree of fault is an important factor in assessing
    a penalty.
    See EPA vs. CPC International,
    Inc.
    #71—338;
    5 PCB 541,
    545
    (October
    3,
    1972).
    This Opinion constitutes the finding of fact and conclusions
    of law by the Board.
    ORDER
    1.
    Respondents must cease and desist from these violations
    of the Environmental Protection Act and the Pollution Control
    Board’s Water Pollution Regulations of Illinois.
    Precautions to
    be taken shall include the distribution to all employees who
    regularly work at the facility of
    a written memo indicating what
    procedures shall be followed in the future to avoid the pollution
    of Klein Creek and its unnamed tributary when an admixture of
    diesel and water
    is found in the trucks’
    tanks or elsewhere on the
    premises.
    A copy of such instructions prepared by Allis-Chalmers
    9—
    699

    —4—
    shall be
    filed with the Agency not later than 60 days after the
    Board’s Order.
    2.
    Respondent Allis-Chalmers shall pay to the State of
    Illinois by December
    31,
    1973,
    the sum of
    $1000 as a penalty for
    violations found in this proceeding.
    Respondent Ryder Truck
    Rental,
    Inc.
    shall pay to the State of Illinois by December 31,
    1973,
    the sum of $2500 as
    a penalty for violations found in this
    proceeding.
    Penalty payment shall be by certified check or money
    order payable to the State of Illinois, Fiscal Services Division,
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency,
    2200 Churchill Drive,
    Springfield,
    Illinois 62706.
    I, Christan L. Moffett, Clerk of the Pollution Cont~olBoard,
    certify that the above Order was adopted on the
    I
    day of
    ______________
    1973,
    by
    a vote of
    ~
    to
    ~
    /~)~
    Christan
    L. Moffett,
    CIe~rk
    Illinois Pollution Cortt~ro1Board
    9—
    700

    Back to top