ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
December
17,
1987
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION AGENCY,
)
Complainant,
v.
)
PCB 84—119
)
POW WOW CLUB,
INC.,
Respondent.
DISSENTING OPINION
(by J. Theodore Meyer):
I dissent from the majority’s acceptance of the settlement
stipulation.
Neither the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency
(Agency)
nor the Attorney General has promulgated any standards
as
to what facto~sshouldbe considered when negotiating
a fine
to be imposed pursuant to a settlement agreement.
I believe that
the $1500 fine agreed upon
in the instant case
is not
sufficient.
If this enforcement action had been brought by a
State’s Attorney or by the Attorney General
in the name of
the
people of the State of
Illinois, Respondent could have been
assessed costs and reasonable attorney’s
fees.
Ill.
Rev. Stat.
1985,
ch.
1111/2, ~par.1042(f).
I am concerned that the instant
fine does not even cover
the Aqency’s costs and fees.
Additionally,
the proposed settlement includes no
information
on the amount of money Respondent may have
saved by
not complying with the Act and the Board’s regulations.
Respondent may have realized quite
a savings by failing
to use
the appropriate controls, and
the $1500 fine may be merely
a
“drop in the bucket” compared with those savings.
Such
a low
fine in the face of possibly large savings through non—compliance
does not encourage the regulated community
to comply with the Act
and the Board’s regulations.
For these reasons,
I dissent.
J~,JTheodot~Meyer
Board Member
84—585
—2—
I,
Dorothy M. Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board, hereb~ycertify the
the above Dissenting Opinion was filed
on the
/7~L#
day of
________________,
1987.
~
~,
Dorothy M./Gunn, Clerk
Illinois Pollution Control Board
84—586