-.

V

“ONTROL

,

a

try

U,

1985

3

-

C

JoNLR

ZY4NSHIP,

)

•

I

~

CITIZENS

)

tILLS

)

s

i

~REhI”R,

)

-

N

EIL,

RONALD

)

ar.d

)

)

I

)

p.

i

—lii

)

)

)

)

to

)

)

)

a

t~cne

,

)

)

)

PCB

4-176

)

(Can..olii4ted)

C,

JY

j\

r~aVTMFRN

)

liLt

-

)

)

I

t

S

1

ft

a

.41

•

c

(‘Cast~

‘k,

)

Lilcd

~

ot

the

As

C

)

tiplic.atson

So

atc

3.

.1

p01

atLo

c’r

c

I

(~5~ hctr

r

it

•aPC

84-i’

r

Li

6

p

o

der

the

Board

con.’~

c

~.

03

an

g.

)

.a~?r2ownsI”p

sca

J~

.t

y

Arc

~

i,

e

w

0

Lacer.

The

nil

a

appc.alac

r

a

lcttc.

•

‘~.

that

hearan)

w11

bc

Fc.bruary

6,

53

.econotlrl

-

T

~

re~

tv

•

~

to

~

ate’

I

---

t

~

3

j

opinic

t

2

h

orrafter

-h4s

3~

t

~,

As

meFtigis

ob

ty

185,

Board

addi

‘s

u

0sae

at

tceo

its

ci

xt°~tingwas

2~,198i

I

£

B

t

d

~as

made

to irtor

le oar

o~of this

r gulation0 pso ide tra

Petitioners

rovide for stinograpi

trans-

i~,

~o va~. aS... ~e petiti

(35

11

appeals (Section 105,104),

and

x

e ific rules

~ections l~6,06,

ly, the Board a- umea th

obli-

ranscriptior

n regulatory

mitters

(

t cases

(Sectior

103,221),

Since

E

d

te the site loca~onsuitability

ç

~.

specific pro ed~ra1rules

he Board has placed the burden

ption on petitionero,

rden of providing

rat scription

appeals

was first addressed by

‘nere the Court stated

(Slip

L

i

tI the mun~cpalitics tta

3

ard should beat the expense

c

~dings I

fore its

rug

oor5ion of the Fnviro ncttal

tanograptitc recerdirg of

‘r’c

so

c

Ye boner

t p

o’ tiling

o

‘

ofrou

,

~c

Boar

close

op

±

he

~ ~‘roecdi

c

revoni

d

3. 10i4

C-

,

j

tirm the decu~io of tI~

o

but order the Bot d to

&eues for

tic o

tne

~n 30, 198~,o o day after

tor,

How tsr

the rardate in

3

Listrict

~c

I

cc

tie

Slip

Na~)only a no JraI party in

t1re

linois Attor

y Genenas

filed

---

•

,

r2t5

~98

‘otor

for

Leave

to

icr

for

eroirng

Intinter,

and

a

ery

7,

118

tie

lard

District

r,

~,

19d’

4.

d

‘Fe.

~etiticn

for

,

t,e

aoasc

..a

ax

kffidavit

of

01.5

Sup

‘it.

..o.rt

aid

Motion

&

.

rer.est

Ui

ktt3rney

General

t

and

t

e

.rt

~xpedted

con—

.

irCt-wcIa

otaswedfrom

•

clrcunotances

wrrcunding

tte

harden

‘,i

md

t

tt.t

that

additional

jud

.~

-

tly,

Boird

will

construe

Cawe

np1

a

oetitacn

for

the

bo~ d

.

stmila~

tne

provided

by

Sect’

d

good

c

se

shcwn,

me

the

co

t

oL

stc~o-

C

of

the

iearir’g

‘

that

each

petition

£

~

e

filed

with

and

granted

‘

a..

e

invalidity,

under

Ottawa,

of

re—

a

3

i.enographic

transcription

as

good

-

t

e.

becease

of

the

statutory

deadline

p-

ng

this

is,ae,

and

sill

grant

r

-

r

-

-r’~

~

ranscription

of

the

a

1~

.

.i’L

1_

ii.

Inter

£

.

PS

t

I.

ys

a

wit.

.

T1-

4

f

I—

a

a

-

‘I

eoftt

S

•

V

p

4

(S

4.

v

r

to

the

teariig

3~t3

11-

3

quara

ca.a’e

S

•“.

for

c.s’~

thepc

Boa’

a

—-

0’

C)

.IJ..

t

ii

aCt..

‘....

luti

‘ii

Control

$

biT,

Ovc.es.

ia’

-dopt&

on

the.

,.

.sr5ayaq-c

C

______

J

-.

ny

•145#~~ 1

i~

C’erb

:‘l

zois’Poflution

Cortrol

Board

£