ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
BOARD
January 7, 1993
A.
B. DICK
COMPANY
)
Petitioner,
)
v.
)
PcB
92—209
)
(Permit
Appeal)
ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL
)
PROTECTION
AGENCY,
)
Respondent.
ORDER
OF
THE
BOARD
(by
G.
T
Girard):
On
December
17,
1992,
A.
B.
Dick
Company
filed
a
petition
for bearing to review certain conditions
imposed
by the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency in its
RcRA
closure plan permit.
In addition the petitioner filed
a
waiver
of decision deadline
until January 1,
1994, which the
hearing
officer shall take into
consideration when setting this matter for hearing.
This
matter
is accepted for hearing.
This
matter concerns closure and post—closure, care issues,
and the parties are particularly directed.to Board opinions and
orders in Browning—Ferris Industries v.
EPA,
P~B84—136, May 5,
1988,
aff’d,
179 Ill. App. 3d 598, 534 N.E.2d 616 (2d Diet.
1989); Marley-Inarid (USA~I. Inc. v. EPA, PCB88—17, January 19,
1989; and Testor Corp.
v.
EPA, PCB 88—191, November
2,
1989 for
discussions of standards of review and burdens of proof.
The
only issues before the Board are whether
correct
permitting
procedures were followed and whether the application demonstrates
that the Environmental Protection Act and Board -regulations will
or will not be violated.
For each contested condition, the Board expects,. and
strongly encourages the parties to state the applicable
regulatory law and relevant facts,
with
appropriate record
citations,
which demonstrate that a violation is likely or
unlikely to occur.
The parties are urged to focus on
RCRA
UDdate. USEPA Reaulations, R87—39,February 25, 1988 and
June
16,
1988 and R87—26, December 3,
1987.
Hearing must be scheduled within 14 days of
the
date
of
this
order and completed within 60 days of the date of this order.
The
hearing officer shall inform the Clerk of the Board of the
time and location of the hearing as expeditiously as possible but
at least 40 days in advance of hearing so that public notice
of
hearing may be published.
After hearing, the hearing officer
shall submit an exhibit list, and all actual exhibits to the
Board within
5
days
of the hearing.
Any briefing schedule shall
provide for final filings as expeditiously as possible and in no
0138-0325
2
event later than 70 days from the date of this order.
If
after appropriate consultation with the parties, the
parties fail to provide an
acceptable
hearing
date
or
if
after
an
attempt the hearing officer is unable to consult with’ the
parties,
the
hearing
officer
shall
unilaterally
set
a
hearing
date
in
conformance
with
the
schedule
above.
This
schedule
will
only
provide
the
Board
a
very
short
time
period
to
deliberate
and
reach
a
decision
before
the
due
date.
The
hearing
officer
and
the
parties are encouraged to expedite this proceeding as much as
possible.
Within
10
days
of accepting this case, the Hearing Officer
shall
enter
a
Hearing
Officer
Scheduling
order
governing
co’npletion
of
the
record.
That
order
shall
set
a date certain.
for each aspect of the case including:
briefing schedule,
hearing date
(8),
completion
of
discovery
(if necessary) and pre-
hearing
conference
(if
necessary).
The
Hearing
Officer
Scheduling
order
may
be
modified
by
entry
of a complete new.
scheduling
order
conforming
with
the time requirements below.
The
hearing
officer may extend this schedule only on a
waiver of the decision deadline by
the
petitioner and only for
the equivalent or fewer number of days that
the
decision deadline
is waived.
Such waivers must be provided i~swriting to the Clerk
of the Board.
Any
waiver
must
be
an
‘~openwàiver”.,or
a waiver of
decision until a date certain.
Because of requirements regarding the publication of notice
of hearing, no scheduled hearing may be Canceled unless the
petitioner provides an open waiver or a waiver to a date at least
120 .days beyond the date of the motion to cancel hearing.
‘This
should allow ample time for the Board
to republish notice of
hearing and receive transcripts from the
hearing
before
the due
date.
Any order by the bearing officer granting cancellation of
hearing shall include a complete new scheduling order with a new
hearing date at least 40 days
in the future and at least 30 days
prior to the new due date and the Clerk of the Board shall be
promptly informed of the new schedule.
Because this proceeding is the
type
for
which
the
Illinois
Environmental Protection Act sets a very short statutory deadline
for making a decision, absent a waiver, the Board will grant
exte”sions
or
modificati-’ms
only
in
unusual
circumstances.
Any
such
,~otionmust
set
fortn
an
iternative schedule for notice,
hearing,
and
final
~ubmjssjons,
as
well
as
the
deadline
for
decision,
including
response
time
to
such
a
motion.
‘However,
no
such
motion
shall
negate
the
obligation
of
the
hearing
officer
to
establish
a
Scheduling
order pursuant to the requirements of this
order,
and
to
adhere
to
that
order
until
modified.
0138~O326
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Boa d, hereby cert
that the above order was adopted on~.the
_____
day of
__________________,
1993,
by a vote of .70
‘~DorothyN. ~d)~nn,Clerk
Illinois Pk3flution Control Board
0138 -0327