BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION  CONTROL BOARD
PEOPLE OF  THE STATE  OF ILLINOIS, 
 )
Complainant,)
-vs-)
No. 
 05 
PCB  -207
PRECISION  TWIST  DRILL CO.,
a  Delaware  corporation, 
 )(Enforcement 
 -
 Air)
Respondent.)
To: 
 See Attached  Service  List.
NOTICE  OF FILING
TO: 
 See  Attached  Service  List
(VIA  ELECTRONIC  FILING)
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE  that today  I have 
filed 
 with the Office of the Clerk  of the  Illinois
Pollution Control  Board by electronic  filing the  following  Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement,  and
Motion to Request Relief from Hearing Requirement,  copies  of which  are  attached  and  hereby  served
upon you.
Respectfully  submitted,
PEOPLE OF  THE  STATE  OF  ILLINOIS
LISA  MADIGAN
Attorney  General
State  of Illinois
BY: 
 4 
 1  
 t 
 i
 t
 ~
Paula Beckefr  Wheeler
Assistant Attorney General
Environmental  Bureau
188  W.  Randolph  St., 
2 0th 
Floor
Chicago,  Illinois  60601 
 -
312-814-1511
DATE:  January 
 12,  2006
THIIS FILING  IS  SUBMITTED  ON  RECYCLED PAPER
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006
SERVICE  LIST
Mr.  John  J.  McAleese  IH
Counselor  at  Law
Morgan, 
 Lewis  & Bockius
l7OlMarket 
 Street
Philadelphia,  PA 
 19103-2921
Mr. 
 Bradley 
 Halloran
Hearing 
 Officer
Illinois  Pollution Control  Board
100 
 West Randolph  Street
Suite 
 11-500
Chicago,  1L. 
 60601
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006
BEFORE  THE ILLINOIS  POLLUTION  CONTROL  BOARD
PEOPLE  OF THE STATE  OF  ILLINOIS,)
Complainant,)
VS.) 
 No. 
 PCB 
 05 -
 207
) 
 (Enforcement 
 -
 Air)
PRECISION  TWIST  DRILL  CO.,  a Delaware 
 )
corporation,)
Respondent.)
MOTION  TO REQUEST  RELIEF
FROM HEARING  REOUIREMENT
NOW COMES  the Complainant,  PEOPLE  OF  THE  STATE OF ILLINOIS,  by LISA
MADIGAN,  Attorney General  of the  State  of Illinois,  and requests  relief from  the  hearing
requirement  in the  above-captioned  matter. 
 In  support  thereof, the Complainant  states  as
follows:
1 
 .
 On  June  7, 2005,  a Complaint  was  filed with  the Pollution  Control  Board
("Board")  in this matter. 
 On  January  12,  2006,  a Stipulation  and Proposal  for Settlement  was
filed  with the  Board.
2. 
 Section  3 1(c)(2)  of the  Illinois  Environmental  Protection  Act ('Act"), 415  ILCS
5/3 1 (c)(2),  (2004),  allows  the  parties  in  certain enforcement  eases  to  request relief from  the
mandatory  hearing  requirement  where  the  parties  have  submitted  to  the Board  a stipulation  and
proposal  for  settlement. 
 Section 3 1 
 (c)(2)  provides:
Notwithstanding  the provisions  of subdivision  (1) of this subsection 
 (c), 
 whenever  a
complaint has been  filed  on behalf of the Agency or by the  People  of the  State of Illinois,
 the parties  may file with  the Board  a  stipulation  and  proposal  for  settlement  accompanied
by a request  for  relief from  the  requirement  of a hearing  pursuant  to subdivision  (1).
Unless  the Board,  in its discretion,  concludes that  a hearing  will  be held,  the Board shall
cause  notice of the  stipulation,  proposal  and request  for relief to be published  and sent  in.
the  same manner  as  is required  for hearing  pursuant to  subdivision  (1) of this  subsection.
The notice  shall  include  a  statement that  any person may file  a written demand  for hearing
within 21  days after  receiving  the notice.  If any person  files a timely  written demand  for
hearing, the  Board  shall  deny the  request  for relief from a hearing  and  shall hold  a hearing
in  accordance  with the provisions  of subdivision  (1).
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006
3. 
 No hearing  is  currently  scheduled  in the  instant  case.
4. 
 The Complainant  requests  the  relief confer-red  by Section  3 1 
 (c)(2)  of the  Act.
WHEREFORE,  the  Complainant,  PEOPLE  OF  THE  STATE  OF  ILLINOIS,  by LISA
MADIGAN,  Attorney General  of the State  of Illinois, requests  relief from the  requirement  of a
hearing  pursuant  to  415  ILCS 
5/3 1(c)(2), 
(2004).
Respectfully  submitted,
PEOPLE  OF  THE STATE  OF  ILLINOIS
LISA  MADIGAN
Attorney  General  of the  State of Illinois
By: 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 __ 
 _ 
 _
PAULA  BECKER  WHEELER
Assistant  Attorney General
Environmental  Bureau
188 W. Randolph  St., 20th  Fl.
Chicago,  Illinois 
 60601
(312)  814-1511
Dated:  January  12,  2006
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006
BEFORE THE ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,
Complainant,
PCB 
 05-207
V.
(Enforcement  -Air)
PRECISION TWIST DRILL CO., 
 a
Delaware corporation,
Respondent.
STIPULATION AND PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT
Complainant,  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,  by LISA
MADIGAN, Attorney General of  the State of  Illinois,  the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency  ("Illinois EPA"),  and PRECISION
TWIST DRILL CO., ("Respondent" or "Precision"),  have agreed to the
making of this Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement
("Stipulation")  and submit  it  to the Illinois Pollution Control
Board  ("Board")  for approval. 
 The parties agree that the
statement of facts contained herein represents a fair summary of
the evidence and testimony which would be introduced by the
parties if a hearing were held. 
 The parties further stipulate
that this stateffent  of facts  is made and agreed upon for purposes
of  settlement only and that neither the fact that a party has
entered into this Stipulation, nor any of the facts stipulated
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006
herein, shall be introduced into evidence in any other proceeding
except as otherwise provided herein. 
 If  the Board approves and
enters this Stipulation, Respondent agrees to be bound by the
Stipulation and Board order and not  to contest their validity in
any subsequent proceeding to implement or enforce their terms.
I. 
 JURISDICTION
The Board has jurisdiction of the  subject ma tter herein and
of  the parties consenting hereto pursuant to the Illinois
Environmental Protection Act  ("Act"),  415  ILCS 5/1 
 et  seq.
(2 
 004)
II. 
 AUTHORIZATION
The undersigned representatives for each party certify that
they-are fully authorized by the party whom they represent to
enter into the terms and conditions of this Stipulation and to
legally bind them to it.
III.  STATEMENT OF FACTS
A. 
 Parties
1. 
 On June 7, 2005,  a Complaint was filed on behalf of  the
People of the State of Illinois by Lisa Madigan, Attorney General
of the State of Illinois,  on her own motion and upon the request
2
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006
of the Illinois EPA, pursuant  to Section 31 of the Act,  415  ILCS
5/31(2004),  against the Respondent.
2. 
 The  Illinois EPA is an administrative agency of the
State of  Illinois, created pursuant  to Section 4 of the Act,'415
TECS 5/4  (2 
 004)
3. 
 At  all times relevant to the Complaint,  Respondent was
and is  a Delaware corporation that  is authorized to transact
business in the State of  Illinois.
B. 
 Facility Description
1. 
 At all times relevant  to the Complaint, Respondent
owned and operated a drill bit manufacturing facility located at
301  Industrial Drive,  Crystal Lake,  McHenry County,  Illinois  (the
"facility").
2. 
 Emission sources at  the facility include a drill bit
stamping process,  rust inhibitor coating operations,  and two cold
cleaning degreasers.
C. 
 Allegations of Non-Compliance
Complainant contends that the Respondent has violated the
following provisions of the Act and Board regulations:
Count I: 
 Failure to Obtain a CAAPP Permit and Pay CAAPP
Permit Fees,  in violation of Section 39.5(6) (b)
of  the Act,  415 ILCS 5/39.5(6) (b) (2002).
Count II: 
 Emission Limitation Violations,  in violation of
Section 9(a)  of  the Act,  415  ILCS 5/9(a)  (2002),
and 35  Ill. Adm. Code 218.204(j) (4).
Count  III: 
 Failure to Keep Records and Submit Reports,  in
violation of Section 9(a)  of the Act,  415  ILCS
5/9(a)  (2002)  and 35  Ill.  Adm. Code 218.211 Cc).
3
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006
D. 
 Non-Admission of Violations
The Respondent represents that  it has entered into this
Stipulation f 
 or the purpose of settling and compromising disputed
claims without having to incur the expense of contested
litigation.  By entering into this Stipulation and complying-with
its terms,  the Respondent does not affirmatively admit the
allegations of violation within the Complaint and referenced
within Section III.C herein, and this Stipulation shall not be
interpreted as including such admission.
E. 
 Compliance Activities
On September 2, 2004,  Respondent submitted an application.for
a Federally Enforceable State Operating Permit  ("FEsoF")  to the
Illinois EPA. 
 Further,  on May 23,  2005,  Respondent began using a
compliant coating in its rust  inhibiting operations. 
 It has also
begun keeping all required records.
IV.  APPLICABILITY
This Stipulation shall apply to and be binding upon the
Complainant and the Respondent, and any officer, director, agent,
or employee of the Respondent,  as well  as any successors or
assigns of the Respondent. 
 The Respondent shall not  raise as a
defense to any enforcement action taken pursuant to this
Stipulation the failure of any of its officers,  directors,
agents, employees or successors or assigns to take such action as
4
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006
shall be required to comply with the provisions of this
Stipulation.
V. 
 COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER LAWS AND REGULATIONS
This Stipulation in no way affects the responsibilities of
the Respondent to comply with any other federal,  state or local
laws or regulations including,  but not  limited to,  the Act and
the Board regulations,  35  Ill. Adm. Code,  Subtitles A through H.
VI. 
 IMPACT ON THE PUBLIC RESULTING FROM ALLEGED NON-COMPLIANCE
Section 33(c)  of the Act,  415  ILCS 5/33(c) (2004),  provides
as follows:
In making its orders and determinations,  the Board
shall take  into consideration all the facts and
 circumstances bearing upon the reasonableness of  the
emissions, discharges, or deposits involved including,
but  not limited to:
1. 
 the character and degree of injury to,  or
interference with the protection of the health,
general welfare and physical property of the
people;
2. 
 the social and economic value of the pollution
source;
3. 
 the suitability or unsuitability of the pollution
source to the area in which it is  located,
including the question of priority of location- in
the area involved;
4. 
 the technical practicability and economic
reasonableness of reducing or eliminating the
emissions, discharges or deposits resulting from
such pollution source;  and
5. 
 any subsequent compliance.
5
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006
In response to these factors,  the parties state the
following:
i. 
 Complainant alleges that human health and the
environment were threatened and the Illinois EPA's  information
gathering responsibilities hindered by the Respondent's alleged
violations.
2. 
 There is  social and economic benefit to the facility.
3. 
 Operation of the  facility was suitable for the area in
which it occurred.
4. 
 Obtaining a permit prior to operation of  the facility,
complying with its  terms,  and complying with the Board's
requirements for coating operations,  including recordkeeping and
reporting,  is both technically practicable and economically
reasonable.
5. 
 Respondent has subsequently complied with the Act and
the Board Regulations, by filing an application for a FESOP in
September,  2004,  using compliant coatings  in its operations,  and
keeping required records. 
 The permit application remains pending
with the Illinois EPA.
VII. CONSIDERATION OF SECTION 42(h) FACTORS
Section 42(h) of the Act,  415  ILCS 5/42(h) (2004) 
, 
 provides
as 
follows:
In determining the appropriate civil penalty to be
imposed under 
 .
 .
 .
 this Section,  the Board is
authorized to consider any matters of record in
6
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006
mitigation or aggravation of penalty, including but not
limited to the following factors:
1. 
 the duration and gravity of the violation;
2. 
 the presence or absence of due diligence on the
part of  the respondent  in attempting to comply
with requirements of this Act and regulations
thereunder or to secure relief therefrom as
provided by this Act;
3. 
 any economic benefits accrued by the respondent
because of delay in compliance with requirements,
in which case the economic benefits shall be
determined by the lowest cost alternative for
achieving compliance;
4. 
 the amount of monetary penalty which will  serve to
deter further violations by the respondent and to
otherwise aid in enhancing voluntary compliance
with this Act by the respondent and other persons
similarly subject  to the Act;
S. 
 the number, proximity in time,  and gravity of
previously adjudicated violations of this Act by
the respondent;
6. 
 whether the respondent voluntarily self-disclosed,
in accordance with subsection i of this Section,
the non-compliance to  the Agency; and
7. 
 whether the respondent has agreed to undertake a
"supplemental environmental project,"  which means
an environmentally beneficial project that a
respondent agrees to undertake in settlement  of an
enforcement action brought under this Act,  but
which the respondent  is not otherwise legally
required to perform.
In response  to these factors, the parties state as follows:
1. 
 Complainant alleges that Respondent failed to obtain a
CAAPP permit within twelve months of the initiation of  the
operation of the  source,  and violated the Board's regulations for
7
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006
coating operations. The alleged violations began on or around
2002,  and were individually resolved at various times.
2. 
 Complainant has determined that Respondent was diligent
in attempting to come back into compliance with the Act, Board
regulations and applicable federal regulations,  once the Illinois
EPA notified it of  its noncompliance.
3. 
 The economic benefit to the Respondent is Five Hundred
Dollars in avoided air pollution site  fees. 
 The parties
stipulate that the payment amount agreed to herein is greater
than the total economic benefit arising from delayed and/or
avoided costs, which would be nominal.
4.. 
 Complainant has determined, based updn the specific
facts of this matter,  that a penalty of Thirty Thousand Five
Hundred Dollars($30,500.00)  will serve to deter further
violations and aid in future voluntary compliance with the Act
and Board regulations.
5. 
 To Complainant's knowledge, Respondent has one
previously adjudicated case alleging violations of the Act.,
concerning groundwater contamination when the Respondent's former
owner abandoned an underground coolant tank that  leaked
trichloroethylene. 
 Said Consent Order was entered October 27,
2005,  case number 03  CHi  521,  in McHenry County,  Illinois.
6. 
 Self-disclosure is not at  issue  in this matter.
,8
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006
7. 
 The settlement of this matter does not  include a
supplemental environmental project.
Vill. 
 TERMS OF SETTLEMENT
A. 
 Penalty Payment
1. 
 The Respondent shall pay a civil penalty in the sum of
Thirty Thousand Five Hundred Dollars  ($30 .500.00) in the manner
prescribed below within thirty  (30)  days from the date the Board
adopts and accepts this Stipulation. 
 The Respondent stipulates
that payment has been tendered to Respondent's attorney of record
in this matter in a form acceptable to that attorney. 
 Further,
Respondent stipulates that said attorney has been directed to
make the penalty payment on behalf of Respondent within thirty
(30)  days from the date the Board adopts and accepts this
Stipulation,  in a manner described below. The penalty amount of
$30,000.00 described in this Stipulation shall be paid by
certified check, money order or electronic funds transfer payable
to the  Illinois EPA, designated to the  Illinois Environmental
Protection Trust Fund. 
 The penalty amount of $500.00 shall be
paid by certified check, money order or electronic funds transfer
payable to the Illinois EPA, designated to the Illinois
Environmental Permit and Inspection Fund. 
 Both payments shall be
submitted to:
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Fiscal Services Section
1021 North Grand Avenue East
P.O. Box 19276
9
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006
Springfield,  IL 62794-9276
The name and number of the case and Respondent's Federal Employer
Identification Number  (FEIN) ,36-2229428,  shall appear on the
checks.  A copy of  the certified checks, money orders or records
of electronic funds transfer and any transmittal  letters shall be
sent to:
Paula Becker Wheeler
Assistant Attorney General
Environmental Bureau
188 
 W. 
 Randolph St., 
 2
 0 th 
 Floor
Chicago,  Illinois 60601
Maureen Wozniak
Assistant Counsel
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
1021 North Grand Avenue East
P.O.  Box 19276
Springfield,  Illinois 62794-9276
2. 
 Pursuant to Section 42(g)  of the Act,  415  ILCS 5/42(g)
(2004),  interest shall accrue on any payment not paid within the
time period prescribed above at  the maximum rate allowable under
Section 1003(a)  of  the Illinois Income Tax Act,  35  ILCS 5/1003
(2004) 
.
 Interest  on any unpaid payment shall begin to accrue
from the date the payment  is due and continue to accrue until the
date payment is received.  When partial payment(s)  are made,  such
partial payment shall be  first applied to any interest  on unpaid
payment then due and owing.  All interest on payment owed shall
be paid by certified check, money order or electronic funds
10
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006
transfer, payable to the Illinois  EPA, designated to the Illinois
Environmental Protection Trust Fund and delivered to the address
and in  the manner described above.
3. 
 For purposes of payment and collection, Respondent may
be reached at  the following address:
Precision Twist Drill Company
301 Industrial Avenue
Crystal Lake,  IL 
 60012
Att'n: 
 David Thompson
4. 
 In the event of default of this Section VIII.A, the
Complainant shall be entitled to all available relief including,
but not limited to,  reasonable costs of collection and reasonable
attorney's fees.
B. 
 Future Compliance
Respondent shall immediately comply with the Illinois
Environmental Protection Act,  415 TLCS  5/1  et  seq.  (2004),
applicable Board regulations,  and further, with the terms and
conditions of  its FESOP permit once issued.
C. 
 Future Use
Notwithstanding any other language in this Stipulation to
the contrary, and in consideration of the mutual promises and
conditions contained in this Stipulation,  including the Release
from Liability contained in Section VIII.E, below, the Respondent
hereby agrees that this Stipulation may be used against the
11
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006
Respondent in any subsequent enforcement action or permit
proceeding as proof of a past adjudication of violation of the
Act and the Board Regulations promulgated thereunder for all
violations alleged in the Complaint in this matter,  for purposes
of Section 39(a)  and  (i) and/or 42(h)  of the Act,  415  TICS
5/39(a) and(i)  and/or 5/42(h) (2004). 
 Further, Respondent agrees
to waive any rights to contest,  in any subsequent enforcement
action or permit proceeding,  any allegations that  these alleged
violations were adjudicated.
D. 
 Cease and Desist
The Respondent shall cease and desist from future violations
of the Act and Board Regulations that were the subject matter of
the Complaint as outlined in Section IIT.C  ("Allegations of Non-
Compliance")  of this Stipulation.
E. 
 Release from Liability
In consideration of the Respondent's payment of the
$30,500.00 penalty and any specified costs and accrued interest,
completion of all activities required hereunder,  its committment
to Cease and Desist as contained in Section VTII.D and upon the
Pollution Control Board's acceptance and approval of the terms of
this Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement,  the Complainant
releases,  waives and discharges the Respondent  from any further
liability or penalties for violations of the Act and Board
Regulations that were the subject matter of the Complaint herein.
12
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006
The release set  forth above does not extend to any matters other
than those expressly specified in Complainant's Complaint  filed
on June 7, 2005. 
 The Complainant reserves,  and this Stipulation
is without prejudice to,  all rights of the State of  Illinois
against the Respondent with respect to all other matters,
including but not  limited to,  the following:
a. 
 criminal liability;
b. 
 liability for future violation of  state, federal,
local,  and common laws and/or regulations;
C. 
 liability for natural resources damage arising out of
the alleged violations;  and
d. 
 liability or claims based on the Respondent's failure
to satisfy the requirements of this Stipulation.
Nothing in this Stipulation is  intended as a waiver,
discharge, release,  or covenant not  to sue for any claim or cause
of action, administrative or judicial, civil or criminal,  past or
future,  in law or in equity, which the  State of  Illinois or the
Illinois EPA may have against any person,  as defined by Section
3.315 of the Act,  415 ILCS 5/3.315  (2004),  or entity other than
the Respondent.
F. 
 Right of Entry
In addition to any other authority,  the Illinois EPA, its
employees and representatives, and the Attorney General, her
agents and representatives,  shall have the right of entry into
13
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006
and upon the Respondent's facility which is the subject of this
Stipulation,  at all reasonable times for the purposes of carrying
out inspections. 
 In conducting such inspections,  the Illinois
EPA,  its employees and representatives, and the Attorney General,
her employees and representatives may take photographs,  samples,
and collect information, as they deem necessary.
G. 
 Enforcement of Board Order
1. 
 Upon the entry of the Board's Order approving and
accepting this Stipulation-and Proposal for Settlement, that
order is a binding and enforceable order of the Illinois
Pollution Control Board and may be enforced as such through any
and all available means.
2. 
 Respondent agrees that notice of any subsequent
proceeding to enforce the Board Order approving and accepting
this Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement may be made by mail
and waives any requirement of service of process.
3: 
 The parties agree that,  if the Board does not approve
and accept this Stipulation and Proposal  for Settlement,  then
neither party is bound by the terms herein.
4. 
 It is  the intent of the Complainant and Respondent that
the provisions of this Stipulation and Proposal  for Settlement
and any Board Order accepting and approving such shall be
severable,  and should any provision be declared by a court of
14
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006
competent jurisdiction to be inconsistent with state or federal
law, and therefore unenforceable, the remaining clauses shall
remain in  full  force and effect.
H. 
 Execution of Document
This document shall become effective only executed by all
parties. 
 This document by be executed-by the parties in one or
more counterparts,  all  of which taken together, shall  constitute
one and the same instrument.
(THE REST OF THIS PAGE IS LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK)
15
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006
WHEREFORE, Complainant and Respondent request that  the Board
adopt and accept the  foregoing Stipulation and Proposal for
Settlement as written.
PEOPLE OF THE STATE 
OF 
ILLINOIS,
LISA MADIGAN
Attorney General
State of Illinois
MATTHEW J. DUNN, Chief
Environmental Enforcement/
Asbestos Litigation Division
BY: 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 DATE:
ROSEMARIE CAZEAU, Chief
Environmental Bureau
Assistant Attorney General
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
BY : 
 DATE:
ROBERT 
A. 
MESSINA
Chief Legal Counsel
PRECISION TWIST DRILL CO.
BY: 
 7A-4
Name: 
 &~.A 
 \i~&At~oALDATE:/2 
 -O
Title: 
 GCQVZ¼. 
 L&pA6\LO3 Q
juh
4
4-'4
1 
4&~a 
 rv4~'
ID 
 fA/ 
7 
 16
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006
WHEREFORE, Complainant and Respondent request that the Board
adopt and accept the  foregoing Stipulation and Proposal for
Settlement as written.
PEOPLE OF THE STATE 
OF 
ILLINOIS,
LISA MADIGAN
Attorney General
State of Illinois
MATTHEW 
J. DUNN, 
Chief
Environmental Enforcement/
Asbestos Litigation Division
B:DATE:____________
Assistant Attorney General
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
BY: 
 DATE:
Chief Legal Counsel
PRECISION TWIST DRILL CO.
BY 
 : 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _
Name 
: 
 DATE:
Title: 
_ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _ 
 _
16
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, 
PAULA BECKER WHEELER,  an  Assistant  Attorney General  in this case,  do certify
that I caused to  be served  this  12th  day of January,  2006,  the foregoing  Stipulation  and  Proposal
for Settlement,  Motion for Request  for  Relief from  Hearing  Requirement  and Notice  of Filing
upon  the person  listed  on  said Notice  by depositing  same  in an envelope,  by first class postage
and certified  mail  prepaid,  with the  United  States  Postal  Service  at  188  West  Randolph  Street,
Chicago,  Illinois,  at  or before the  hour of 5:00  p.m.
PAULA  BECKER  WHEELER
January  12,  2006
ELECTRONIC FILING, RECEIVED, CLERK'S OFFICE, JANUARY 12, 2006