ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    August
    7,
    1975
    VELSICOL CHEMICAL CORPORATION,
    Petitioner,
    v.
    )
    PCB 74—312
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
    Respondent.
    OPINION AND ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by Mr. Goodman):
    This matter comes before the Pollution Control Board
    (Board)
    upon Velsicol Chemical Corporation’s
    (Velsicol)
    May
    8,
    1975, second amended petition for variance from Rule
    205(f)
    of the Air Pollution Regulations.
    Velsicol seeks
    this variance in order to continue operation of its poly-
    merization until June
    30,
    1975, while installing pollution
    control equipment which will completely recycle Petitioner’s
    hydrocarbon emissions.
    Velsicol’s petrochemical plant
    is located in Clark
    County near Marshall,
    Illinois.
    The plant manufactures
    agricultural chemicals and~hydrocarbonresins from petroleum
    fractions.
    Velsicol’s products are used
    in hot melt ad-
    hesives, mastiks,
    contact cements, metallic paints,
    latex
    paints, varnishe~, rubber compounding,
    core oils,
    hard—
    board saturants and rotogravure inks.
    The plant utilizes
    9400 pounds of petroleum fractions per hour, 180 pounds of
    boron trifluoride catalyst per hour,
    and 85 pounds of lime
    per hour.
    Velsicol’s catalytic polymerization unit has two vents
    which emit hydrocarbon vapor to the atmosphere.
    The poly-
    merization receiver vent’s emissions of 0.58 pounds per hour
    are within the standards of 205(f).
    However,
    the Eimco
    vent’s emissions of a benzene—toluene—xylene mixture from
    119 to 130 pounds per hour exceed the permissible emission
    rates.
    In Velsicol chemical Company v.
    EPA, PCB 73-543,
    the
    Board granted Velsicol
    a variance from 205(f)
    until August
    31,
    1974.
    Velsicol’s plan of compliance
    at that time consisted
    of installing an afterburner to incinerate hydrocarbon
    vapors.
    With the encouragement of the Environmental Pro-
    tection Agency
    (Agency)
    ,
    Velsicol has developed a new com-
    pliance plan which wculd conserve energy and completely
    recycle the hydrocarbon vapors.
    The Agency issued a con-
    struction permit to Velsicol on July 17,
    1974.
    The emission
    18
    300

    —2—
    control facility consists of explosion control instrumen-
    tation at a cost of $6480.00; an explosion proof compressor
    at a cost of $22,820.00; and furnace burners
    at a cost of
    $1,510.00.
    Velsicol had intended to be in compliance by
    April
    30,
    1975.
    However, due to the arrival of the 125
    horse power electric motor which powers the compressor in
    damaged condition,
    compliance
    is not expected until June
    30,
    1975.
    After installation of the pollution control devices,
    the plant will recover the air-hydrocarbon vapor mixture
    from the Eirnco vent,
    remix that gas with natural gas, com-
    press that product and then burn it in the process
    furnace
    of the Raw Material Converter.
    Although the Board does not construe the denial of
    a
    variance as
    a “shut down order”, Petitioner alleges that
    denial of this variance would result in the dismissal of 121
    employees,
    and the withdrawal of 5,000,000 pounds per month
    of hydrocarbon resins from the open market.
    Velsicol,
    also,
    alleges that
    it would lose sales
    in the amount of $500,000.00
    per month and its raw material suppliers would lose some
    $250,000.00 per month in revenues.
    The Board finds that Velsicol’s compliance plan
    is
    reasonable and that the denial of the variance would result
    in unreasonable har3.~hipto Petitioner and its employees,
    in view of the fact that Petitioner had no control over the
    delay in complaince.
    The grant of a variance herein will
    have
    a minimal effect on the ambient air quality in the area
    and will ultimat~:1ybenefit the ambient air quality and
    conserve needed energy resources.
    In consideration of the
    foregoing,
    the Board will grant Velsicol
    a variance from
    Rule 205(f)
    for its Marshall plant from August
    31,
    1974,
    to
    and including June
    30,
    1975.
    This Opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact
    and conclusions of
    law in this matter.
    ORDER
    It
    is the Order of the Pollution Control Board that
    Velsicol Chemical Company be and is hereby granted a var-
    iance from Rule 205(f)
    of the Air Pollution Regulations for
    its Marshall,
    Illinois, catalytic polymerization unit from
    August
    31,
    1974,
    to and including June
    30,
    1975.
    I, Christan
    L. Moffett,
    Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
    Control Board, hereby certify the above Opinion and Order
    were ado~tedon the
    ~7N
    day of
    ,
    1975 by a
    vote of
    ~
    18
    301
    Christan L. Moffett,/~brk
    Illinois Pollution
    C45~’ntrol
    Boa~rd

    Back to top