ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    February
    6,
    1986
    IN THE MATTER OF:
    )
    )
    R86—6
    WOODSTOCK DIE CAST,
    INC.
    )
    ORDER OF THE BOARD
    (by J. Anderson):
    On December
    27,
    1985, Woodstock Die Cast, Inc.
    (Woodstock)
    filed a petition for emergency rulemaking with the Board.
    The
    petition seeks to have certain wastes which Woodstock produces
    “delisted”
    from the hazardous waste listings of
    35
    III.
    Adm. Code
    721.
    The petition was filed pursuant to Section 22.4(a) and
    27(c)
    of the Environmental Protection Act
    (Act), and
    35 Ill. Adm.
    Code 102.120,
    720.120(a) and 720.122(a).
    On January 16, 1986,
    Woodstock filed an additional statement of reasons.
    The wastes
    in question are wastewater treatment sludges from
    electroplating operations.
    Such sludges are listed as hazardous
    wastes from non-specific sources under generic code F006 in 35
    Ill.
    Adm.
    Code 721.131 and
    40 CFR 261.31.
    They were listed as
    generic hazardous wastes upon a finding by USEPA that such
    sludges usually contain the following hazardous constituents:
    cadmium, chromium
    (VI),
    nickel and complexed cyanide.
    (35 Ill.
    Adm.
    Code 721. Appendix C, 40 CFR 261, Appendix VII).
    On March
    18,
    1981,
    the United States Environmental
    Protection Agency
    (USEPA) granted Woodstock
    a “temporary
    exclusion”
    from the listing pursuant to 40 CFR 260.22
    (46 Fed.
    Reg.
    17198).
    USEPA determined that, although the waste was
    a
    wastewater treatment
    sludge from electroplating operations,
    it
    did not contain the hazardous constituents which caused the waste
    to be listed.
    Section 3001(f)(1) of the Hazardous and Solid Waste
    Amendments of 1984 (HSWA) mandated USEPA to review all temporary
    exclusions by November
    8,
    1986,
    and provided that all temporary
    exclusions will expire on that date.
    Woodstock alleges that it
    needs Board action on the temporary exclusion up to that date.
    In the event the exclusion is continued under HSWA,
    the Board may
    be able to take further action pursuant to Section 22.4(a).
    In
    1980,
    IEPA determined that the waste was not hazardous
    based on law which existed at that time
    (Exh.
    D to Petition).
    The validity of this determination is uncertain because of the
    great changes to the definition of hazardous waste
    in Illinois
    since that time.
    Beginning in
    1981,
    the Board adopted regulations
    establishing the Illinois RCRA hazardous waste program.
    The
    regulations were adopted pursuant to Section 22.4(a)
    of the Act,
    and are “identical in substance” with USEPA’s RCRA rules.
    The

    -2-
    RCRA rules
    were last amended
    in R85-22 on December
    20,
    1985.
    The
    history of these rulemakings is summarized
    in the Board’s Opinion
    adopted January
    9,
    1986.
    Illinois received phase
    I interim
    authorization on May 17,
    1982,
    and final authorization on January
    31,
    1986.
    The Board has not adopted the March
    18, 1981 temporary
    exclusion granted Woodstock.
    This exclusion does not appear
    in
    40 CFR 260-266, the federal regulations which the Board has
    followed, pursuant to Section 22.4(a) of the Act, to fashion the
    Illinois program.
    Furthermore, Woodstock has, until now, never
    petitioned the Board pursuant 35
    Ill. Adm. Code 720.122 to delist
    this waste at the State level.
    In the absence of such
    a
    petition, the Board had no way of determining whether
    it was
    necessary to adopt the specific exclusion as
    a part of the
    Illinois program.
    Section
    720.122(c) authorizes the Agency to determine that
    a
    waste from a particular source is not subject to the Board’s RCRA
    regulations.
    The proposal alleges that IEPA has made such
    a
    determination (paragraph
    8).
    However, Woodstock has attached no
    letter from IEPA containing the determination.
    As noted above,
    the 1980 letter from IEPA predates Section
    720.122(c), and
    predates the Board’s definition of hazardous waste
    (Part
    721)
    which the Agency must apply in making its determination pursuant
    to Section 720.122(c).
    To the extent
    IEPA may have made such a
    determination since 1980,
    such action would seem to contradict
    USEPA’s temporary exclusion pursuant to Section 260.22, which
    requires an initial determination that the waste meets
    the
    regulatory definition of hazardous waste.
    If the sludge did not
    meet the F006 listing in the first
    place, there was no need to
    delist
    it by regulatory action.
    Woodstock has asked that the Board adopt
    a delisting
    regulation by way of emergency rulemaking pursuant to Section
    27(c), alleging that the conflict between federal and state
    law
    is
    a “threat to the public
    interest, safety or welfare.”
    However, this allegation
    is inconsistent with Woodstock’s failure
    to file
    a regulatory petition until nearly four years after
    Illinois’ receipt of interim authorization.
    The Board therefore
    will not proceed by way of emergency rulemaking.
    Section 22.4(a) of the Act requires the Board to adopt
    regulations which are “identical in substance to federal
    regulations.”
    Section 20(a)(5)
    et
    seq. establishes the
    legislative intent that Illinois get and keep RCRA
    authorization.
    Section 4(1) names IEPA as the lead agency in the
    authorization process.
    The Board notes that the USEPA,
    in its January 31,
    1986
    final authorization action, addressed the delisting issues
    in
    part by stating:

    -3—
    Response.
    Due to the Sections 3006(g) and 3001(E)
    of RCRA,
    as amended by the Hazardous and Solid
    Waste Amendments
    of
    1984,
    (HSWA) and amendments
    made to 40 CFR 260.22 on July 15,
    1985,
    (50 FR
    28702),
    Illinois will not have independent
    authority to delist hazardous waste.
    Section
    3001(f)
    of RCRA as amended requires U.S.
    EPA to
    examine factors
    in addition to those that caused
    the waste to be
    listed when delisting
    a waste.
    Furthermore, U.S. EPA is required to provide the
    public with notice and comment prior to making
    a
    final determination on any petition.
    These
    requirements were codified
    in
    40 CFR 260.20 and
    260.22 on July 15,
    1985.
    The Illinois regulations,
    35 IAC 720.120 and 720.122,
    do not appear to
    be
    equivalent to these new requirements.
    Furthermore,
    the Attorney General’s Statement is based on an
    analysis of the State’s equivalency to the federal
    regulations promulgated by July 29,
    1984.
    Since
    the new Federal rules were promulgated
    subsequent
    to that date, U.S. EPA does not believe that the
    Attorney General has certified to this
    equivalence.
    According to Section 3006(g) of RCRA,
    as
    amended, until a State receives authorization
    for any HSWA provision,
    U.S. EPA is responsible for
    administering that portion of the program.
    Since
    U.S. EPA does not believe that
    35 IAC 720.120 and
    720.122 are equivalent to new 40 CFR 260.20 and
    720.22, and these are HSWA requirements, the State
    is not authorized to delist wastes
    in lieu of U.S.
    EPA.
    Consequently, a company which wants
    its waste
    delisted must comply with both 40 CFR 260.20 and
    260.22 and
    35 IAC 720.120 and 720.122.
    The proposal raises several fundamental questions on which
    the Board needs
    to be better informed before deciding whether to
    publish a proposal for public comment.
    The Board requests that
    the IEPA and USEPA respond to the following questions by March
    15,
    1986.
    IEPA is specifically asked to respond to question
    number
    5.
    This request does not preclude other participants from
    responding during this time period.
    1)
    Are the March
    18,
    1981 temporary exclusions “federal
    regulations” under federal law and thus subject to
    delisting under Section 22.4(a)
    of the Act?
    2)
    During the interim authorization period, did the Board
    listings
    in 35
    I1!l.
    Adm. Code 721 define the scope of
    the RCRA hazardous waste program in Illinois?
    3)
    Did USEPA authorize Illinois
    to delist wastes pursuant
    to interim authorization?

    —4—
    4)
    Will delisting authority change with future phases of
    authorization, particularly HSWA related?
    5)
    Has
    IEPA in fact determined since interim authorization,
    pursuant to Section 72O.122(c),
    that the waste does not
    meet the Part 721 definition of hazardous waste?
    If
    IEPA has done
    so,
    is this action inconsistent with
    USEPA’s findings in temporarily delisting the waste?
    Finally, the petition as filed does not include proof of
    service on the USEPA,
    as required to the Board’s RCRA Procedural
    Rules adopted
    in R84-1O on December 20,
    1984
    (35 Ill.
    Adm. Code
    102.123).
    The Petitioner shall promptly provide such proof of
    service.
    IT IS SO ORDERED.
    Bill Forcade dissented.
    I, Dorothy M. Gunn, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
    Board, hereby certify that the abo e Order was adopted on
    the
    _________________
    day of
    __________________,
    1986 by
    a vote
    of
    _______________.
    /&~—
    Dorothy M. gunn, Clerk
    Illinois Pollution Control Board

    Back to top