ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
    January
    8, 1981
    ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
    )
    PROTECTION AGENCY,
    )
    )
    Complainant,
    )
    )
    v.
    )
    PCB
    79—218
    )
    VILLAGE OF CREVE COEUR,
    )
    a Municipal Corporation,
    )
    )
    Respondent.
    MR.
    THOMAS
    R.
    CHIOLA,
    ASSISTANT
    ATTORNEY
    GENERAL,
    APPEARED
    ON
    BEHALF
    OF
    THE
    COMPLAINANT.
    MR.
    MICHAEL
    MATHIS,
    ATTORNEY
    AT
    LAW,
    APPEARED
    ON
    BEHALF
    OF
    THE
    RESPONDENT.
    OPINION
    AND
    ORDER
    OF
    THE
    BOARD
    (by
    N.E.Werner):
    This
    matter
    comes
    before
    the
    Board
    on
    the
    October
    18,
    1979
    Complaint
    brought
    by
    the
    Illinois
    Environmental
    Protection
    Agency
    (“Agency”).
    Count
    I
    of
    the
    Complaint
    alleged
    that
    the
    Village
    of
    Creve
    Coeur
    (the
    “Village”)
    operated
    its
    municipal
    sewage
    treatment
    facility
    (the
    “facility”
    or
    “plant”)
    in
    such
    a
    manner
    as
    to
    violate
    its
    NPDES
    Permit
    conditions
    every
    month
    from
    December,
    1977
    until
    August,
    1979
    in
    that
    the
    Respondent
    failed
    to
    meet
    both
    the
    7-day
    and
    30—day
    average
    discharge
    limitations
    for
    biochemical
    oxygen
    demand
    and
    suspended
    solids
    in
    violation
    of
    its
    NPDES
    Permit
    No.
    IL
    0021237,
    Rule
    901
    of
    thapter
    3:
    Water
    Pollution
    Control
    Regulations (“thapter
    3”)
    and
    Sections
    12(a)
    and
    12(f)
    of
    the
    Illinois Environmental Protection
    Act
    (“Act”).
    Count II alleged that, from October 23, 1977 until October 18,
    1979,
    the Village failed to provide
    optimum
    operation and mainte-
    nance of its plant (i.e., there was “cold weather malfunctioning of
    flow meter”, lack of laboratory quality control, “gasification in
    the grit tank,
    insufficient cleaning of the grit tank”, etc.) in
    violation of its NPDES Permit, Rule 901 of thapter 3 and Sections
    12(a) and 12(f) of the Act.
    (See: Exhibit A).
    Count III alleged that, from October 23, 1977 until October 18,
    1979, the Respondent failed to monitor the discharges of BOD5 and
    suspended solids from its facility in violation of its NPDES Permit,
    Rule 901 of thapter 3
    and Sections 12(a) and 12(f) of
    the Act.
    A
    hearing was held on November 25, 1980.
    The parties filed a
    Stipulation and Proposal for Settlement on
    November
    26, 1980.
    40—233

    The Village of Creve Coeur, which is
    located in Tazewell
    County,
    Illinois, discharges wastewater from its sewage treatment
    plant into the Illinois River,
    Discharge monitoring reports
    submitted to the Agency for the months of December,
    1977 through
    August, 1979 indicate that discharges from the Respondentts facility
    exceeded the NPDES Permit limits for BOD5 and suspended solids.
    (Stip.
    3;
    Exhibits 3—24).
    An Agency inspection of the facility
    on January
    9,
    1979 indicated that numerous deficiencies in the
    operation and maintenance of the plant existed.
    (See:
    Exhibit
    25).
    This Agency inspection also showed “that sampling was not being
    conducted on a 24—hour composite basis.”
    (Stip.
    4),
    The Stipulation states that:
    “Respondent was the subject of
    a complaint in
    PCB 75-402 which was characterized in the Board
    opinion of February
    3,
    1977 as “lack of maintenance
    which resulted in
    the
    discharge of improperly treated
    wastewater into the Illinois River”
    (opinion, p.
    1).
    A Proposed Compliance Schedule was incorporated as
    part of the Order
    in
    that case.
    Respondent success-
    fully completed all portions
    of
    the compliance
    program by the date of filing
    of
    the present complaint.
    The present complaint, however, has alleged violatiori~
    other than those previously cited and the proposal for
    settlement in
    this
    case goes beyond the past compliance
    schedule,”
    (Stip.
    4),
    The parties have also stipulated that “the ultimate solution
    to the problem of discharges in excess of Respondent~spermit
    limits is through addition of new sewage treatment facilities,”
    (Stip.
    5).
    To accomplish
    this purpose,
    the Agency has offered
    the Village of Creve Coeur “a conditional
    grant for construction
    of a regional plant with
    the Village of Marquette
    Heights.”
    (Stip.
    5).
    Both the
    Respondent
    and
    the Village of
    Marquette Heights
    plan to engage
    in cooperative
    plans for the plant in
    the near future.
    The proposed
    settlement agreement
    provides
    that the
    Village
    admits the violations
    alleged
    in the Complaint and agrees
    to:
    (1)
    meet specified
    effluent
    limitations
    for
    BODç
    and
    total
    suspended
    solids;
    (2)
    inspect
    the lift stations
    on
    a daiTy
    basis and
    maintain
    an adequate spare parts inventory
    for
    its lift stations and
    chlorinator unit;
    (3) regularly test
    for BOD5 and total sus~-
    pended solids;
    (4)
    “have
    the grit
    chamber cleaned at least once
    every month or when
    the
    chamber
    is
    filled
    to
    25—33
    of its volume
    capacity, whichever occurs
    first”;
    (5)
    buy additional sections
    of hose to facilitate the use
    of
    a portable sludge pump in case of
    malfunction of the stationary pump;
    (6)
    employ a sufficient
    operating staff to properly run the plant;
    (7)
    maintain the
    schedule for completion of
    its
    grants project;
    and
    (8) pay a
    stipulated penalty of $5,000.00
    .
    (Stip.
    5-8).
    Additionally, the
    Agency has agreed to modify the Respondent~sNPDES Permit to allow
    time composited samples.
    (Stip,
    6).
    40—234

    —3
    In evaluating this
    enforcement action
    and proposed settlement
    agreement,
    the Board
    has
    taken
    into
    consideration all the facts
    and circumstances in
    light of the
    specific criteria delineated in
    Section 33(c) of the
    Act.
    The Board finds
    the settlement agreement
    acceptable under Procedural Rule 331 and Section 33(c)
    of the Act.
    The Board finds
    that the Respondent
    has violated its NPDES
    Permit, Rule 901 of
    Chapter
    3:
    Water Pollution
    Control Regulations,
    and Sections 12(a) and 12(f)
    of the Act.
    The Board orders the
    Respondent to comply with the terms and conditions of the proposed
    settlement agreement
    and hereby assesses the $5,000.00
    stipulated
    penalty against the Respondent,
    This Opinion constitutes
    the Board~sfindings of fact and
    conclusions of law
    in this matter.
    ORDER
    It is the Order of
    the Illinois
    Pollution Control Board that:
    1.
    The Respondent, the Village of Creve Coeur, has violated
    Rule 901 of Chapter
    3:
    Water Pollution Control
    Regulations
    and
    Sections 12(a)
    and 12(f)
    of the Illinois Environmental
    Protection
    Act.
    2.
    Within
    45 days
    of
    the
    date
    of
    this
    Order,
    the
    Village
    of
    Creve Coeur shall,
    by
    certified check or money order
    payable to the
    State of Illinois,
    pay the stipulated penalty of
    $5,000.00 which
    is
    to be sent to:
    Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
    Fiscal Services Division
    2200 Churchill Road
    Springfield,
    Illinois
    62706
    3,
    The
    Respondent shall comply with all the terms
    and
    conditions of
    the
    Stipulation and Proposal for
    Settlement filed on
    November 26,
    1980, which is incorporated by reference as
    if fully
    set forth
    herein,
    Chairman
    Dumelle
    concurs.
    I,
    Christan L, Moffett, Clerk
    of the Illinois Pollution
    Control
    Board, hereby
    certify that the above Opinion
    and Order were adopted
    on the ______day
    of
    _____,
    1981
    by
    a
    vote
    of
    ~fl
    C~anL.Moett,~,~~k
    Illinois
    Pollution Con
    ol Board
    40—235

    Back to top