ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
December
1,
1994
IN THE MATTER OF:
)
PETITION OF WINNEBAGO RECLAMATION
)
AS 94-11
SERVICE,
INC. FOR AN ADJUSTED
)
(Adjusted Standard)
STANDARD, FROM 35 ILL. ADM. CODE
)
811.710(c)
AND
811.713(c) (1)
)
JOHN HOLSTROM III, APPEARED ON BEHALF OF WINNEBAGO RECLAMATION
SERVICE,
INC.;
ROBERT J. SCHERSCHLIGHT APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ILLINOIS
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.
OPINION
AND
ORDER OF THE BOARD
(by
E. Dunham):
On June 2,
1994, Winnebago Reclamation Service,
Inc.
(petitioner)
filed a petition for adjusted standard regarding
Pagel’s Landfill Facility in Winnebago County,
Illinois.
A
certificate of publication was filed on August
4,
1994.
The
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (Agency)
filed a
recommendation with the Board on June 7,
1994, recommending that
the adjusted standard be granted.
A hearing was held in this
matter on October 14,
1994,
before hearing officer Allen
Schoenberger.
No members of the public attended the hearing.
The Board’s responsibility in this matter arises from the
Environmental Protection Act
(Act)
(415 ILCS 5/1 et
seq.
(1992)).
The Board is charged therein to “determine, define and implement
the environmental control standards applicable in the State of
Illinois” (415 ILCS 5/5(b) (1992)) and to “grant
*
*
*
an adjusted
standard for persons who justify such an adjustment”
(415 ILCS
5/28.1(a) (1992)).
More generally the Board’s responsibility is
based on a system of checks and balances integral to Illinois
environmental governance: the Board
is charged with the
rulemaking and principal adjudicatory functions, and the Agency
is responsible for carrying out the principal administrative
duties.
ADJUSTED STANDARD PROCEDURE
The adjusted standard provision of the Act, at Section 28.1
(415 ILCS 5/28.1
(1992)), was created by the legislature to
provide an expedited alternative to site-specific rulemaking.
The result of either an adjusted standard or a site—specific rule
proceeding is the same
(i.e.,
relief from a particular rule).
In both a general rulemaking proceeding and a site—specific
rulemaking proceeding, the Board, pursuant to Section 27 of the
Act,
is required to take the following factors into
consideration: the existing physical conditions, the character of
the area involved, including the character of surrounding land
2
uses,
zoning classifications, the nature of the existing air
quality, or receiving body of water,
as the case may be, and the
technical feasibility and economic reasonableness of measuring or
reducing the particular type of pollution.
(See specifically,
Section 27(a).)
Section 28.1 of the Act establishes the level of
justification required for an adjusted standard and also requires
the adjusted standard to be consistent with Section 27(a).
The
level of justification required, as set forth in Section 28.1(c),
is that the petitioner present adequate proof that:
•
factors relating to that petitioner are substantially
and significantly different from the factors relied
upon by the Board in adopting the general regulation
applicable to that petitioner;
•
the existence of those factors justifies an adjusted
standard;
•
the requested standard will not result in environmental
or health effects substantially and significantly more
adverse than the effects considered by the Board in
adopting the rule of general applicability; and
•
the adjusted standard is consistent with any applicable
federal law.
DISCUSSION
Petitioner requests relief from 35 Ill. Adm. Code 811.710
and 811.713 as those sections specify the form of trust and
letters of credit allowed as financial assurance for closure and
post closure care of a waste disposal site in Winnebago County.
The site in question, Pagel’s Pit,
is on the Federal National
Priorities List
(NPL)
established under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liabilities Act
(CERCLA).
The U.S. EPA has accepted the trust and letters of
credit offered by petitioner
in a consent decree entered on
February 10,
1993, between U.S. EPA and petitioner in United
States vs. Winnebago Reclamation Service Inc.
et al.
No.
92C20346, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois, Western Division.
The Board finds that Winnebago Reclamation Service,
Inc. has
provided sufficient justification for the granting of an adjusted
standard.
Petitioner is not subject to 35 Ill. Adm. Code Parts
724 and 725 and has already provided financial assurance to the
U.S. EPA and the Agency for Closure/Post-Closure activities as
part of the consent decree.
The granting of the adjusted
standard will not result in environmental or health effects
substantially or significantly more adverse than the effects
3
considered in adopting the rule.
The adjusted standard is
consistent with federal law.
The Board finds that imposition of financial assurance
according to the forms specified in Appendix A of 35 Ill. Adm.
Code 811 in addition to the trust and letters of credit specified
in the consent decree constitute an unreasonable hardship for
petitioner.
The Board notes that the site is under strict
scrutiny of the Agency and of the U.S.
EPA, and that the consent
decree containing the existing financial assurance mechanism is
enforceable by the consent of the parties in Federal Court.
The Board therefore, grants an adjusted standard to
Winnebago Reclamation Service,
Inc. from the financial assurance
forms allowed under 35
Ill. Adm. Code 811.710(a)
and
811.713(c) (i) as ordered below.
This opinion constitutes the Board’s findings of fact and
conclusions of law in this matter.
ORDER
The Board hereby grants the following adjusted standard from
35 Ill.
Adm. Code 811.710 and 811.713 to Winnebago Reclamation
Service,
Inc.:
In addition to the mechanisms which may be utilized
under 35 Ill.
Adin. Code 811.706 to provide financial
assurance for closure and post closure case and for
corrective
action,
Winnebago
Reclamation
Service,
Inc.,
shall
be entitled to utilize
the Letter
of
Credit and the Trust Fund established
pursuant to
the Consent Decree in the case entitled United Staes
vs Winnebago Reclamation
Service.Inc.,
et
al.
No.
92C20346,
U.S.
District
Court
for
the
Northern
District of Illinois, Western Division,
to provide
financial assurance for any closure and post closure
and corrective action activities at the Pagel’s Pit
Landfill facility which are also required under that
Consent Decree.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Section 41 of the Environmental Protection Act,
(415 ILCS
5/41 (1992)), provides for appeal of final orders of the Board
within 35 days of the date of service of this order.
The Rules
of the Supreme Court of Illinois establish filing requirements.
(See also 35 Ill. Adm. Code 101.246, Motion for Reconsideration.)
4
I, Dorothy M.
Gunn,
Clerk of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board,
do hereby certify that the above opinion and order was
adopted on the /~
day of _____________________________
1994, by a vote of
7’—~)
.
,
Clerk
~lution Control Board
Doro
-
Illinois
V