ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
June
30,
1988
IN THE MATTER OF:
AMENDMENTS TO SUBTITLE C:
)
R85—29
WATER POLLUTION.
FECAL
)
COLIFORM AND SEASONAL
)
DISINFECTION
CONCURRING OPINION
(by J.D.
Dumelle):
My reasons
for concurring lie
in the vagueness
of Section
302.209.
The essence of any rule
is that a literate person can
read it and determine
if
it applies
to that person’s activities.
Section 302.209(a) defines “protected waters”
as
those which
“have
the physical characteristics
to support primary contact.”
But nowhere
in the rule are “physical characteristics” defined.
Is water depth one of these characteristics?
Children can wade
and splash
in very shallow waters.
Is current speed one of the
characteristics?
Most Illinois streams are sluggish except
during and following rainstorms.
Section 302.209(b) defines waters exempt from the bacterial
standard.
It speaks of “waters unsuited for primary contact uses
because of physical, hydrologic or geographic configuration
...“
But what are
those configurations?
What streams are
exempt?
How
is one
to know?
A second part of the Section 302.209(b)
exemption reads
“and
are located
in areas unlikely to be frequented by the public on
a
routine basis
...“
What
it
“routine basis?”
Is
it daily,
weekly, monthly or annually?
One might answer the questions posed above by stating that
IEPA should spell out these phrases
in guidelines or
in
Practice.
But,
to me,
such guidelines would invade the Board’s
rulemaking province.
How is one
to determine from the rule whether
a stream
is
a
“protected water”
or not?
It
is impossible and the rule,
being
vague, may be
ill—administered
and adults and children may become
seriously
ill from bacterial co~E~mination
Chairman
90—661
I,
Dorothy
M.
Gunn, Clerk
of the Illinois Pollution Control
Board,
hereby certify that the above Concurring Opinion was
submitted on the
______________
day of
~
,
1988.
~
Dorothy M.gGunn, Clerk
Illinois ~o11ution Control Board
90—662