ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
December
15, 1988
IN
THE MATTER
OF:
PRETREATMENT UPDATE
)
R88-18
(1/1/88 through 6/30/88)
FINAL ORDER.
ADOPTED RULES
OPINION
OF
THE BOARD
(by J.
Marlin):
The Board
is
amending the pretreatment
regulations
pursuant
to Section
13.3 of the Environmental
Protection Act
(Act).
The text
is contained
in
a
separate Order
of this same day.
Section
13.3 of the Act
requires the Board
to
adopt
regulations which
are
“identical
in
substance’ with federal
regulations
promulgated
by the
United
States Environmental Protection Agency
(USEPA)
to
inplement the pretreatment
requirements
of Sections
307 and
402 of the Clean Water Act, which was
previously
known
as the Federal Water Pollution Control
Act.
Section 13.3
provides that Title VII of the Act
and Sections
5
and 6.02 of the
Administrative Procedure Act
(APA)
do not apply
to identical
in substance
regulations adopted
to
establish the pretreatment
program.
However, Section
13.3 of the Act
does require the Board
to
provide
for
notice
and
public
comment
before rules
are filed with
the Secretary of State.
5.8. 1834
(P.A.
85-1048) includes
a definition
of
“identical
in
substance”
in new Section
7.2 of
the Act.
This legislation codifies
the
Board’s
past interpretations
of
its mandate under Section
13.3 of the Act.
This rulemaking
updates the pretreatment
rules
to cover
LISEPA rules
adopted from January
1 through
June
30, 1988
The following Federal
Registers
are
included:
53 Fed.
Reg. 1704
January
21,
1988
53 Fed.
Reg.
9176
March
21,
1988
The Agency filed
a public
comment
in
R88-1 which
included
a
list
of
typographical
errors
in the
rules adopted
in R86-44.
The Board
has made this
comment
a public
comment
in this Docket,
in
order
to address
errors made
in
an
identical
in substance rulemaking
in the
same procedural
context.
The Board adopted
a Proposed Opinion
and
Order
on September 22,
1988.
The proposed
rules appeared
on October
14,
1988,
at
12
Ill.
Reg. 16396.
The
Board
received
a determination
of
no
effect from
the Small
Business Office
of
the Department
of
Commerce and Community Affairs,
and codification comments
The Board
appreciates the assistance
of Morton Dorothy
in drafting the Order
and Opinion.
94—237
—2—
from the Administrative Code Unit.
The Board
has
received
no other
public
comment.
The pretreatment rules govern discharges
by
industrial
users
to
publicly
owned
treatment works
(POTWs).
The rules
are
intended to
prevent
industrial
discharges from passing through POTW treatment plants without adequate
treatment
to waters
of the State,
and
to prevent
industrial
discharges
from
interfering with the ope~-ation of the treatment plant.
The Illinois pretreatment
rules
are contained
in
35
Ill.
Adm. Code 307
and 310.
Part 307 includes the categorical
pretreatment
standards, which are
incorporated
by
reference from the USEPA rules.
Part
310 specifies how
a
POTW
sets up
a pretreatment
program,
and how
industrial
users
get pretreatment
permits
or authorizations
to discharge.
The Illinois pretreatment
rules were adopted
in R86-44, Opinion
and Order
of the Board
of December
3,
1987.
The rules
appeared
on January
29,
1988 at
12
111.
Reg. 2502.
They were filed
with
the Secretary of State
on January
13,
1988.
The pretreatment
rules
were amended
in the following update rulemaking:
R88-11
June 14,
1988;
12
Ill.
Reg.
13094,
effective July 29,
1988
(USEPA amendments
through December
31,
1987).
R88-18
This Docket
(January
1 through June 30,
1988).
The specific amendments derived from the USEPA actions affect only the
categorical
pretreatment
standards reflected
in Part 307;
there
are no USEPA
amendments
to the program requirements
of Part 310.
The following
is
a
summary of the amendments:
January
21
Modifications for
the Primary Tungsten Subcategory.
March
21
Modifications for Leather Tanning Subcategory.
Both
of these represent
minor modifications
to the USEPA rules
resulting
from litigation.
The changes
are mainly
updated incorporations
by
reference.
Most
of the changes
are corrections
of minor typographical
errors which
occurred
in adoption
of Parts
307 and 310
in R86-44.
Many
of these were
pointed
out
by the Agency
in
its
public comment
in R88-1,
as discussed above.
DETAILED DISCUSSION
Section 307.1508
This Section corrects
the spelling of
“sherbet’,
and corrects
the
incorporation by reference of 40 CFR
405.86.
“Sherbet”
is misspelled
in the
USEPA rule,
but
the Board
has corrected
it here.
The Board
has
not corrected the spelling of
“buttermilk”
or
“butter
milk”
It
is unlikely that this would mislead
anyone.
Attempting
to
correct
minor
typographical
errors
carries
a
risk of making
a major error.
The
Board
94—238
-3—
has
noted
many
of the Agency’s suggestions,
and will
correct them as these
Sections
come
up
for review.
In R86-44 the Board
generally referenced the
1986 edition
of the Code of
Federal
Regulations.
The Board
has
updated the
references
in
all
Sections
up
for
review to
the 1987 edition.
Section
307.1704
“Onto”
has
been corrected
to read
“into”.
Section
307.2101
“Contracted”
has
been corrected to
read “contacted”.
Section
307.2903
“Of”
has been corrected
to read
“or”.
In Section
307.2904, the Board
cannot find
the error mentioned
by
the
Agency
in
its
comment.
In Section
307.3100, there
is
no rule which prohibits
omission
of
subsection labels.
Section
307.3100(b)
is
reserved for
a
reserved
USEPA Section.
There
is
a
rule against
placing
a
“reserved”
in the
subsecti on.
Section 307.3110
The pretreatment
standards
for primary tungsten manufacture were amended
at
53 Fed.
Reg.
1711, January
21,
1988.
Section 307.3129
The spelling
of
“tungsten”
has
been corrected,
and
an
extra
“or”
dropped.
Several minor errors
noted
by the Agency
in ensuing Sections have
been noted,
but
no changes
have been made at
this time.
In Section
307.4301,
the applicability statement
is
absent,
reflecting the unique
structure of
40
CFR 433, which was discussed.
in R86-44.
Section 307.3500
et
seq.
Several
introductory rules and pretreatment
standards relating to Leather
Tanning
and Finishing were amended
at
53 Fed. Reg. 9181,
March
21, 1988.
Section 307.4004
The Board
has corrected
a
reference to
a USEPA rule
in
this Section.
Section 307.8100
The problem noted
by the Agency
has been corrected by
insertion of
“alloys”.
The Board
has considered the Agency’s suggestions
as
to
rewording
the USEPA language and
grammar,
but declines to
do
so,
since
the USEPA
language
is understandable.
94—23 9
-4-
Section 310.107
The Board
has updated the references
to the Code of
Federal Regulations
to
reflect
the 1987 edition.
The Board solicited comment
as
to whether
any of
the remaining references
need updating, but received
no
response.
Section 310.110
In R86—44 the Board adopted definitions
of
“treatment works”,
“unit
of
local
government”
and
“POTW”.
The federal
text
had to
be changed,
in part
to
accommodate constitutional
and statutory definitions
of
“unit
of
local
government”
and
“municipality”,
and
in part
to avoid
relying
on
a
reference to
a
federal
statutory definition.
In crafting these definitions,
the Board
inadvertently omitted the
State of Illinois
as
an entity which becomes
a
POTW
when
it
operates
a treatment works
under
40 CFR 403.3(o).
The Board has
corrected this error.
The Board
addressed the similar definition
of Section 301.365
in R88-1.
As was discussed
in
Scott Air Force Base
v.
IEPA, PCB
88-69, August
10,
1988,
federal
facilities within
Illinois
are not
“POTW’s” within the meaning
of the
NPDES program.
This appears
also
to
be USEPA’s intent
with respect
to the
pretreatment program.
The main effect
of this
is
that
federal
facilities
are
not
required
to develop pretreatment
programs.
In
Section 310.311(a) the Board
cannot
find the problems noted
by the
Agency.
The
forms
of
reference between portions
of the Administrative Code
are mandated
1
Ill.
Adm. Code 100.370.
The remaining typographical
errors
in
Part
310
have been noted,
and will
be corrected
as
the Sections come up for
review.
This Opinion supports the Board’s Order
of this same day.
The Board will
withhold final
filing of
these rules until
January
17,
1989,
in order
to
allow
motions for reconsideration
by the agencies involved
in
the authorization
process.
IT
IS
SO ORDERED.
I, Dorothy M.
Gunn, Clerk
of the
Illinois Pollution Control B9ard,
hereby
certify
that the
above Opinion was adopted
on
the /5~day of
/i-~~
~
1988,
by
a vote of 7~
.
/.
~L
~
Dorothy
NI.
Gujln, Clerk
Illinois Poll~utionControl
Board
94—240